I’m a member of Sussex Genealogy and family history Classification thereby provides entry to this new Cuckfield baptisms after that- unless I’m lost one thing and also the on the internet databases is not complete?
1804 Louisa REEVE (also an entry to have Louisa JUPP), base born to Sarah REEVE and you may William JUPP 1806 John JUPP, dad John JUPP and you will mother Sarah JUPP
History a couple interesting one to each other mothers have been called Sarah. I’m sure he Milan girls are the most attractive is only trying confuse myself! But in reality they are simply baptisms I’m able to notice that was vaguely relevant. There was a Sarah JUPP bap 1791, however with my Sarah dying in 1886 I can’t see that becoming sensible! I’d including build their unique rather avove the age of their own partner. Hmm.
Burt, on that notice regarding 1791 bap, might you be thus kind on have a peek at the SMI to own a glaring relationship for this individual excite? Just before I start getting my head race about this chances of it becoming my personal Sarah it could be extraordinary to learn when the it’s very unprobable! Thank you so much. Paula
For individuals who article me your elizabeth-mail target having fun with In the I will send you new webpage complete statement of all of the Sarah JUPP 1755-1837 by the get back
Thinking about Mary Ann DENCH d/o Daniel & Esther DENCH, she can be found at a later date surviving in Sussex along with her more youthful aunt Esther
Paula, I’ve drawn a basic think of this query of yours, need to admit even though I am not feeling 100% this evening, so if I sound like I am rambling then i most likely have always been, But who’s Daniel Dench and you may really does the guy squeeze into the ancestry? I mention within the 1841 Edward and you can Sarah Pheby have an excellent Mary Ann Dench ages 0 together with them, and you can (which away from recollections) this woman is managing Thomas and you will Elizabeth Matthews when you look at the 1851 or 1861 and you will named niece, Daniel Dench partnered Esther Matthews inside the 1841; is Esther Thomas Matthews aunt? Daniel Dench was born in Cuckfield, We thus ask yourself if the he is associated with Sarah Pheby nee Jupp? A new question: Edward and you will Sarah’s de- Izett, does you to title function because a surname on your genealogy and family history?
Ironically new entry quickly above the baptism out of Emily Izet PHEBY within the Dec 1944 is that of Susannah DENCH b 1844 d/o Daniel & Esther
Daniel is on the new 1841 / 1851 census offering his season out of birth 1815 /16 place of birth Cuckfield he passes away 1854
Thank you for the new interesting information regarding the new you can easily Dench partnership. I got listed Mary Ann Dench towards the 1841 which have Daniel and you may Sarah Pheby (nee Jupp) but had disregarded they and had in past times never understood where first off their unique. I think I will need to create a tiny Dench/ Matthews tree to determine the partnership. There indeed seems a substantial amount of circumstantial proof you to with Mary Dench managing Daniel and you will Sarah in 1841, Daniel Dench are away from Cuckfield plus the Dench baptism with the Emily Izett Pheby baptism. I’ve tried to determine the explanation for Emily’s middle name are Izett and just have receive little most, however, I would personally look at one name inside Cuckfield today. Thank you for your fresh thoughts on this- having a unique opportunity to research has given me some guarantee!
Firstly do you get the list Ok? This could search a silly concern, however, do you have research beyond reasonable question you to definitely Sarah Pheby of the 1841, 1851 & 1861 Census try you to as well as the same as new Sarah Jupp married during the Cuckfield? In other words do you have one of several high school students produced once 1837’s Delivery Certification? I am not saying 100% happy in regards to the Sarah for the 1871 while the the woman is indexed given that married, but there is no partner expose, and just why should she say Brighton in the event that metropolitan areas given in past times was next to one another as there are few other support information on new webpage. The name Pheby are rare, the main downfall as the various ways it can be spelled or mis-transcribed.
No responses yet