Moral Factors
Every ethical points was indeed guaranteed, depending on the assistance regarding Quality No. of your own Ministry of Health. Their perform is actually approved by the Integrity and you may Research Chamber from the fresh Centro de Filosofia age Ciencias Humanas of your own Universidade Federal manage Rio de- Janeiro (UFRJ) (CAAE Zero. 03490118.8. and Process No. 3.). Towards front page of your online survey, there can be the new Free and you may Informed Consent Title (FICT), and this exhibited facts about the dangers and you can advantages of reacting the study, additionally the be certain that out-of detachment out of agree, instead bias at any time. Solely those people just who appeared the brand new agree option got usage of the research content. Individuals who don’t see the concur option was indeed rerouted to the end of the newest survey.
To research you’ll variations in PCM and you may NCM, with respect to the sociodemographic variables: sex, career, proper care of young sisters, visibility or lack of someone, and having or perhaps not with children, comparisons ranging from groups have been made making use of the Mann-Whitney U shot ( Desk 1).
In the 1st, the relationship ranging from PCM and you may NCM was evaluated and it is unearthed that PCM (Yards = ; DP = ) correlates adversely to the NCM (M = ; DP = ); p =
Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation (U = 37; p = .035; PS est = .47), presence/absence of partner (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .29) and presence/absence of children (U = 21; p = .002; PS est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed (Mdn = ), who had one or more children (Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship (Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked (Mdn = ), who had no children (Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship (Mdn = ).
On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex (U = 19; p = .000; PS est = .43) and the presence/absence of children (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .34). It was observed that both women (Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children (Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men (Mdn = ) and participants with children (Mdn = ).
Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. PCM levels showed no differences between people who were dating and people who were married or in a stable union (U = 29; p = .039; PS est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union (U = 5; p = .000; PS est = .41), of which married people (Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union (Mdn = ).
Two Spearman correlations was indeed conducted. 000; r = -.494; r 2 = .24. On 2nd research brand new dating between PCM, NCM and you will 16 private and contextual details was basically checked-out and certainly will rise above the crowd for the Table 2. Poor contacts have been receive one another positive and negative anywhere between PCM or NCM and 12 of your own parameters tested. Particularly new sociodemographic parameters: “quantity of sisters” and “beginning buy” and the personality products: “conscientiousness” and you will https://internationalwomen.net/sv/skandinaviska-kvinnor/ “transparency to play” displayed zero significant correlations with PCM and NCM.
Нет Ответов