The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.
The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.
The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.
This supported the hypothesis that rationalist epistemology seems for the an effective less amount of engagement on Wedding subscale plus the constructivist epistemology looks on the an elevated degree of wedding with the Engagement subscale
Thus, epistemology (rationalist compared to. constructivist) try discovered to be a life threatening predictor regarding procedures concept. Particularly, by far the most robust conclusions render provisional help on understanding one there are particular variations in the non-public sorts of the counselor according to the therapists’ epistemic assumptions. Way more especially, the modern investigation learned that practitioners with rationalist epistemologies tended to the a lot more length, less amount of wedding, good narrower desire, and you will a greater standard of thought in their lessons with website subscribers, while, the latest constructivist epistemology tended towards the having a greater standard of intimacy, an elevated amount of wedding, a larger desire, plus love of life within their procedures instructions. On the other hand, there was some support with the belief that therapists which have constructivist epistemologies are likely towards the the new guidelines of independence in the über 60 Dating place of firmness inside the their procedures concept; however this was not a really strong trying to find in today’s investigation.
These conclusions are useful when it comes to the fresh new possibly inherent variations was able because of the rationalist rather than constructivist epistemologies based on medication layout. A great deal more specifically, newest results support the understanding you to definitely intellectual-behavioral therapy, hence show a knowledgeable depiction of rationalist epistemology, care for an “active-directive” and you can logical method to cures (Granvold, 1988) with certain goals familiar with plan the course of one’s lesson (Mahoney Lyddon, 1988).
Theory dos-Epistemology Has an effect on the fresh Healing Relationships
According to second hypothesis-practitioners with rationalist epistemologies will rating higher to the Activity and you may Goal subscales minimizing toward Thread subscale compared to the constructivist epistemologies-some other several linear regression design try conducted to determine in the event your same predictor varying (counselor epistemology) would influence therapists’ critiques of your own criterion variables (functioning alliance) predicated on therapists’ millions of about three subscales-Activity, Mission, and you can Bond.
No responses yet