Partial correlation analysis (managing to possess lifetime of dating) produced mixed abilities ( Table 2)

On average, participants had been active in the on line dating at issue to own up to 2 yrs, half a year (2 years, five days to have Japanese, three years, 30 days to have U.S. Us citizens, and another year, seven days to have Koreans). The latest course don’t change significantly across the around three countries ( Dining table step one). The typical amount of era spent on the net didn’t vary somewhat around the countries (approximately you to and another half times to have Japanese, as well as 2 circumstances and you may 20 minutes both for People in the us and you may Koreans).

Tips

To assess online self-disclosure and relationship development, the present study employed several scales constructed in previous Internet and FTF relationship studies (e.g., Parks Floyd, 1996; Parks Roberts, 1998). Self-disclosure was operationalized by the depth and breadth measures used by Parks and Floyd (1996). A separate self-disclosure variable was created by the composite score of depth and breadth, for each dimension is crucial to representing self-disclosure in theory. Correlation between breadth and depth was significant for all cultures, ranging from low to high (r= .36, p < .001 for Japanese, .64, .001 for U.S. Americans, and .31, .05 for Koreans). In addition, the validity of the composite self-disclosure scale was confirmed by comparing the correlation coefficients of the respective depth and breadth measures with relationship development measures in the present study.

Relationship quality try operationalized from the an element regarding issues away from based tips having salient relational possess frequently employed during the earlier education. The brand new scales incorporated would be the breadth and you will depth out-of dialogue (self-disclosure), interdependence, interpersonal predictability/insights, code convergence, partnership, and you may system overlap (getting more information, look for Parks Floyd, 1996; Areas Roberts, 1998). And the relationship invention scale, the present analysis with it other salient dating high quality measures such as for instance preference, love, and you can trust (pick Canary Stafford, 1992, 1994, more resources for these types of methods). Most of these balances acquired moderate so you’re able to high reliability coefficients regarding the introduce data. Precision coefficients of those tips varied ranging from .fifty (interdependence) and you will .90 (love). Table step 1 presents the newest means and you will practical deviations each variable.

The entire questionnaire was straight back interpreted into Korean and Japanese having the brand new reason for the study ( Banks Banking companies, 1991). To evaluate to discover levels of dating invention one of Korean CMC profiles, the theoretical midpoint each and every size was used due to the fact a resource area (following the Parks Floyd, 1996). A score below the midpoint means a low number of dating invention, while a score above the midpoint suggests a higher rate off growth in terms of the dimensions under consideration.

Efficiency

H1 predict you to definitely self-revelation from inside the CMC could be similar to that of FTF, and thus in both contexts mind-disclosure try undoubtedly of relationships top quality. Self-disclosure was somewhat surely of this most of the matchmaking high quality parameters but on the internet circle convergence, that has been perhaps not in the quantity of mind-revelation anyway. In the event high, the newest organization ranging from worry about-disclosure and you can believe are weakened (.32), when you’re most other correlations was indeed reasonable to solid. In terms of the a couple trick size of notice-revelation, an equivalent trend came up to have breadth however getting depth. Breadth from correspondence was notably absolutely pertaining to all dating qualities, and you may breadth was also with the exception of on the web circle convergence.

Note: All the = the entire take to; Inter = Interdependence, Assume = Predictability/Knowledge, Comm = Partnership, Code = Password Overlap, OnNet = On the web System Convergence, OffNet = Traditional System Convergence, Times = Times Spent Online Every day, Size = Lifetime of On the internet Dating;

Note: The = the complete take to; Inter = Interdependence, Predict = Predictability/Insights, Comm = Union, Code = Code Overlap, OnNet = Online System Overlap, OffNet = Traditional Community Overlap, Period = Instances Invested On the internet Every day, Duration = Time of Online Dating;