I suggest suppressing the initial sentence from point step 3

We surmise that results obtained from the experiments described in this section cannot serve to understand the role of I_NaL in arrhythmogenesis.

step 1. Van Driessche W, Lindemann B: Attention dependence regarding currents compliment of solitary sodium-selective pores inside the frog surface. Nature. 1979; 282 (5738): 519-520 PubMed Abstract | Copywriter Complete Text

It means this new good results submit by this manuscript are maybe not justified and that i try not to agree the brand new manuscript within setting

The latest experts keeps clarified several of the inquiries I elevated during the my personal earlier in the day remark. Regrettably, most of the major problems have not been treated by this upgrade. Whenever i stated in my past comment, We deem they impractical that every those people factors shall be repaired only from the a number of added sentences. As an alternative there are particular basic issues into fresh construction and you will, most significantly, into study.

It indicates the newest strong conclusions put forward by this manuscript are not rationalized and that i cannot agree new manuscript within means

This new article authors keeps explained several of the concerns I raised inside the my personal past feedback. Unfortunately, most of the biggest dilemmas haven’t been handled from this revise. When i made in my personal earlier comment, We consider they unrealistic that most the individuals circumstances will likely be fixed simply because of the several extra sentences. As an alternative you can still find some standard questions with the experimental framework and you will, research paper writing service cheap very vitally, towards the investigation.

• The very best issue is if We then followed this new malfunction away from the methods in the earlier version it absolutely was you can in order to decode, having nearly perfect precision, people random stimulus brands We selected. Come across having types of this reanalysis. No matter whether i imagine that actual stimuli checked at the a later on time or try constantly switching anywhere between code and you may quiet, the brand new decryption is obviously next to prime. This is certainly indicative that decryption doesn’t have anything to accomplish to your actual stimuli heard from the Sender it is opportunistically exploiting various other enjoys on the studies. The new handle studies the latest article authors did, treating the new stimulus brands, dont address this matter because is suffering from alike state. Fundamentally, just what classifier was presumably playing with it’s time who has enacted because tape started.
• The reason for this is certainly presumably that the article writers utilized low-separate study to possess degree and investigations. If in case I know truthfully (get a hold of section step three), random sampling half of data examples out of a keen EEG shadow commonly independent studies. Repeating the research 5 times – the fresh handle data brand new experts performed – isn’t an acceptable cure for target this concern. Randomly searching for samples out of a period of time series that has slow change (including the slow revolution pastime you to presumably dominates this type of recordings not as much as these situations) tend to invariably incorporate strong temporal correlations. Look for TemporalCorrelations.jpg in for 2D thickness histograms and you can a correlation matrix proving which.
• Since the changed procedures section will bring increased detail now, it continues to be unclear about exactly what studies were utilized. Antique classification analysis statement just what research have (typical articles regarding the studies matrix) and what findings (common rows) were used. One thing would-be a feature however, usually this is this new different EEG channels or fMRI voxels etc. Observations are usually big date products. Here I suppose brand new article writers turned this new raw examples for the good more space playing with prominent part studies. It is not said should your dimensionality was quicker making use of the eigenvalues. In either case, I suppose the info samples (amassed during the 128 Hz) have been next utilized as findings in addition to EEG streams turned because of the PCA were used as the have. Brand new stimulus labels was in fact tasked since Into the or Away from per attempt. A collection of 50% out of samples (and you may brands) was then selected at random getting education, additionally the others was used for comparison. So is this correct?