, 2015; Cardoso and you will Souza, 2016; Santiago and you may Saliba, 2016; 2 Santos and Jalalzai, 2021). Inside performs we will focus on misogyny given that recognized by all of our interviewees relating to Rousseff’s 6 many years in the power, especially centering on the partnership ranging from misogynistic backlash therefore the gendered twice join character understood. Regarding the adopting the point you can expect a far more nuanced meaning to possess each of the subcategories understood (see Desk 2), bringing remain-by yourself significance and you can examples regarding the data in conjunction with descriptive analyses of secret times for the Rousseff’s presidency one to exemplify the new active between our very own nuanced suggestion to own analyzing the fresh gendered double bind, misogynist backlash, and its issues on Rousseff’s presidency.
The new four subcategories known starred in the knowledge from the different levels (find Tables step three, 4). A couple themes appeared in higher ratio: Evaluation so you can Guys and Misogynyments styled because review to men featured inside nearly half all the interviews and you will illustrated thirty-six per cent from most of the comments codifiedments themed since the misogyny was indeed the vast majority of comments (38 %) and starred in forty two % of all interviews. Quite simply, interviewees had been extremely aware away from Rousseff’s part due to the fact chairman compared to many other men political leaders and you may former presidents, and also the means Rousseff is actually punished throughout the their management due to gendered expectation and backlash.
Whenever you are looking which have less frequency on interview, the other a few templates offer very important perspective so you can information you are able to sexist backlash for the presidency out-of Brazil’s very first lady president. Conversations how Rousseff made an effort to conform to gendered expectations ascribed to help you female (Complying towards Twice Join) appeared in more 10 % of your remark coded and you may interview conducted. At the same time, talk about how Rousseff confronted this new gendered hopes of their position (Tricky the brand new Double Join) appeared in over one to 5th of all of the interviews, constituting sixteen percent of all the comments coded.
The new description of your own numerical density of one’s thematic research will bring a kick off point so you’re able to a great qualitative analysis of every theme, concentrating on the relationship anywhere between each motif, especially the relationship within three layouts really pertaining to the newest gendered double join (comparison, complying, and you will difficult) in addition to misogynistic backlash that followed.
Investigations so you can guys
Among subcategories known was comparisons regarding Dilma Rousseff to dudes, each other comparing Rousseff so you’re able to male politicians and you can outlining how anything will be other in the event that Rousseff was indeed a guy. Hence, we discovered that there’s each other a conceptual parts and you can standard aspect of their own research so you’re able to dudes. When you look at the an abstract experience, we often noticed the phrase, “when the she had been a person” to explain just how a posture will have starred away in different ways got Dilma maybe not been a lady. The postorder fru Kinesiska story represented in our interview try out-of a system one to “favors men” (Respondent 88, ), having “no open gender discrimination, but the proven fact that [a politician] was a person is actually an advantage” (Respondent 8, ). Whenever sharing which testing even more concretely, there’s a look closely at Rousseff’s scratchy character, the fresh “tough woman up to tender men.” New offer less than will bring alot more framework:
Conversations about Rousseff’s impeachment together with sexism and you may misogyny at the rear of the newest techniques was in fact chatted about in the common mass media (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and you can Kaiser, 2016) plus in scholarly functions (Zdebskyi ainsi que al
Yes, plus they said that she try a painful people, you to definitely she cannot keep in touch with some body, one to she got an enthusiastic authoritarian way of speaking. Exactly what for men appears as a go with “no, he or she is a painful people, a personal-sure person that understands what he wants.” So you’re able to their was showed because the bad “zero, she does not understand how to cam, this woman is hard, the woman is which” into the a terrible way. How they correspond with you, feminine. I have hit a certain status, our company is getting harsh, the audience is deviating off so you can how to be a female, that is nice, transparent, hushed and you may such as for instance. The form of Dilma getting ‘s the variety of ladies who have the ability to getting solid in this a totally patriarchal business, up against it buy you to definitely is obtainable (Respondent 79, ).
Нет Ответов